They help to give evolution an appearance of legitimacy and are widely accepted as scientific fact. Its intention is to accurately date samples of unknown origin based on the ratio of Carbon-14 in the atmosphere compared to the levels in the plant or animal.
But are radiometric dating methods such as Carbon-14 reliable? Here’s a quick primer on the basics: Atoms are made up of much smaller particles called protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Do they prove Evolution Theory and that the earth is billions of years old? Carbon-14 is a method of radiometric dating that was invented in 1947 by Dr. Protons and neutrons make up the center (nucleus) of the atom, and electrons form shells around the nucleus.
The number of protons in the nucleus of an atom determines the element.
Whenever the worldview of evolution is questioned, the topic of carbon dating always comes up.
However, as we will determine, all radiometric dating methods are based on assumptions about events that happened in the past. Assumptions based on the belief that the future will be like the past.
If you are a young earth creationism believer, click here.So if scientists believe that a creature lived millions of years ago, then they would need to date it another way. They assume dinosaurs lived millions of years ago (instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says).They ignore evidence that does not fit their preconceived notion.It is incapable of yielding dates in the millions of years.In high school biology courses they often teach about the inevitable failures of closed systems by taking an aquarium and placing snails, plants and a bowl of water inside; then sealing the aquarium so that no air may get in or out.
B., Human Evolution (Chicago: Rand Mc Nally, 1975), p.